{"type":"system","subtype":"init","cwd":"/home/agent/AgentSDE/agent-core","session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","tools":["Task","TaskOutput","Bash","Glob","Grep","ExitPlanMode","Read","Edit","Write","NotebookEdit","WebFetch","TodoWrite","WebSearch","TaskStop","AskUserQuestion","Skill","EnterPlanMode","EnterWorktree","ExitWorktree","CronCreate","CronDelete","CronList","ToolSearch","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__atlassianUserInfo","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getAccessibleAtlassianResources","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getConfluencePage","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__searchConfluenceUsingCql","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getConfluenceSpaces","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getPagesInConfluenceSpace","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getConfluencePageFooterComments","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getConfluencePageInlineComments","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getConfluenceCommentChildren","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getConfluencePageDescendants","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__createConfluencePage","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__updateConfluencePage","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__createConfluenceFooterComment","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__createConfluenceInlineComment","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getJiraIssue","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__editJiraIssue","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__createJiraIssue","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getTransitionsForJiraIssue","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getJiraIssueRemoteIssueLinks","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getVisibleJiraProjects","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getJiraProjectIssueTypesMetadata","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getJiraIssueTypeMetaWithFields","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__addCommentToJiraIssue","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__transitionJiraIssue","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__searchJiraIssuesUsingJql","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__lookupJiraAccountId","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__addWorklogToJiraIssue","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getIssueLinkTypes","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__createIssueLink","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__searchAtlassian","mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__fetchAtlassian","ListMcpResourcesTool","ReadMcpResourceTool","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_send_message","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_schedule_message","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_create_canvas","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_update_canvas","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_search_public","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_search_public_and_private","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_search_channels","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_search_users","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_read_channel","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_read_thread","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_read_canvas","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_read_user_profile","mcp__claude_ai_Slack__slack_send_message_draft"],"mcp_servers":[{"name":"claude.ai Google Calendar","status":"needs-auth"},{"name":"claude.ai Gmail","status":"needs-auth"},{"name":"claude.ai Atlassian","status":"connected"},{"name":"claude.ai Slack","status":"connected"}],"model":"claude-sonnet-4-6","permissionMode":"default","slash_commands":["debug","simplify","batch","loop","claude-api","ar-e2e-cleanup","ar-ops-sweep","ar-pm-sweep","ar-tech-sweep","e2e-audit","address-review","compound-learnings","deliver-implementation","evaluate-issues","implement-code","investigate-and-fix","plan-and-propose","plan-task","product-manager","reply-to-issue-comment","reply-to-pr-comment","review-code","review-document","review-pr","scan-codebase","summarize-document","write-tests","ar-e2e-cleanup","e2e-audit","ar-ops-sweep","ar-pm-sweep","openclaw","ar-tech-sweep","compact","context","cost","heapdump","init","pr-comments","release-notes","review","security-review","extra-usage","insights"],"apiKeySource":"none","claude_code_version":"2.1.76","output_style":"default","agents":["general-purpose","statusline-setup","Explore","Plan"],"skills":["debug","simplify","batch","loop","claude-api","ar-e2e-cleanup","ar-ops-sweep","ar-pm-sweep","ar-tech-sweep","e2e-audit","address-review","compound-learnings","deliver-implementation","evaluate-issues","implement-code","investigate-and-fix","plan-and-propose","plan-task","product-manager","reply-to-issue-comment","reply-to-pr-comment","review-code","review-document","review-pr","scan-codebase","summarize-document","write-tests"],"plugins":[],"uuid":"f35a3a8e-6df6-40fd-b33a-2d10550af825","fast_mode_state":"off"}
{"type":"assistant","message":{"model":"claude-sonnet-4-6","id":"msg_01RWRrxUdCywTRcXrkmyAZ19","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Let me follow the compound-learnings skill instructions. I need to:\n\n1. Extract env vars: ISSUE_NUMBER=457, TASK_DIR=/home/agent/AgentSDE/tasks/production/AgentSDE/agent-core/gh-457, PROJECT_ROOT=/home/agent/ai-agents-sde/.claude/worktrees/agent-core/issue-457-agents-md\n\n2. Gather context by reading the task files and AGENTS.md\n\n\n3. Now I'm reading through the relevant files to understand the issue and requirements.","signature":"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"}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":6965,"cache_read_input_tokens":14160,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":6965},"output_tokens":0,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"},"context_management":null},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"260be17a-f53e-46a5-81c2-a018a48d7d54"}
{"type":"assistant","message":{"model":"claude-sonnet-4-6","id":"msg_01RWRrxUdCywTRcXrkmyAZ19","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_012fhBHPWvsmGpebh7iAjGwr","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/home/agent/AgentSDE/tasks/production/AgentSDE/agent-core/gh-457/plan/task.json"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":6965,"cache_read_input_tokens":14160,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":6965},"output_tokens":0,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"},"context_management":null},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"0485faf1-624e-4b85-8d14-7873b7bec385"}
{"type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","content":"File does not exist. Note: your current working directory is /home/agent/AgentSDE/agent-core.","is_error":true,"tool_use_id":"toolu_012fhBHPWvsmGpebh7iAjGwr"}]},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"4bb2c873-1d54-4920-b3f5-8eafb81c419e","tool_use_result":"Error: File does not exist. Note: your current working directory is /home/agent/AgentSDE/agent-core."}
{"type":"assistant","message":{"model":"claude-sonnet-4-6","id":"msg_01RWRrxUdCywTRcXrkmyAZ19","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01NQJivkoLaRpPMbZz7Qohpa","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/home/agent/AgentSDE/tasks/production/AgentSDE/agent-core/gh-457/plan/plan.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":6965,"cache_read_input_tokens":14160,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":6965},"output_tokens":0,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"},"context_management":null},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"1de7010f-831a-47a5-8283-bc5d2399d685"}
{"type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01NQJivkoLaRpPMbZz7Qohpa","type":"tool_result","content":" 1→# AW-11: Create BullMQJobQueue implementing JobQueue interface\n 2→\n 3→## Summary\n 4→\n 5→Replace the SQLite-backed job queue with a BullMQ/Redis-backed implementation behind a `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` config flag. BullMQ dependencies (`bullmq`, `ioredis`, `@nestjs/bullmq`) are already installed from AW-2; the existing `BullModule.forRootAsync` pattern in `InvokeModule` (line 13) provides the Redis connection blueprint.\n 6→\n 7→## Files\n 8→\n 9→| File | Action | Description |\n 10→|------|--------|-------------|\n 11→| `src/queue/bullmq-job-queue.ts` | create | BullMQ implementation of `JobQueue` interface using `Queue` + `Worker` |\n 12→| `src/queue/bullmq-job-queue.spec.ts` | create | Unit tests for BullMQJobQueue |\n 13→| `src/queue/queue.module.ts` | modify | Conditional provider registration based on `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` |\n 14→| `src/config/config.schema.ts` | modify | Add `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` Joi validation (valid: `sqlite`, `bullmq`; default: `sqlite`) |\n 15→\n 16→## Steps\n 17→\n 18→1. Add `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER: Joi.string().valid('sqlite', 'bullmq').default('sqlite')` to `config.schema.ts` (line 26).\n 19→2. Create `src/queue/bullmq-job-queue.ts` implementing `JobQueue` interface (`enqueue()`, `onJob()`). Use BullMQ `Queue` for enqueuing and `Worker` for consuming. Inject `ConfigService` for Redis connection config (`REDIS_HOST`, `REDIS_PORT`, `REDIS_DB`) — follow the same `BullModule.forRootAsync` pattern from `invoke.module.ts:13-23`. Use `TenantConfigService` for per-org queue name isolation. BullMQ natively handles stalled job retry — no manual `onModuleInit` recovery needed.\n 20→3. Implement per-issue concurrency control: use BullMQ's `job.data.issueNumber` as a group key to prevent concurrent processing of the same issue (matching `SqliteJobQueue`'s atomic claim semantics).\n 21→4. Update `queue.module.ts` to use a factory provider: inject `ConfigService`, read `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER`, conditionally instantiate `BullMQJobQueue` or `SqliteJobQueue` for the `JOB_QUEUE` token. Import `BullModule.forRootAsync` and `BullModule.registerQueue` only when driver is `bullmq`. Keep `SqliteJobQueue` imports (TypeORM, EventEmitter) for the `sqlite` path.\n 22→5. Create `bullmq-job-queue.spec.ts` with tests: enqueue adds job to queue, `onJob` registers handler, stalled job auto-retry, per-issue dedup, error handling marks job failed, and `OnModuleDestroy` cleanup.\n 23→\n 24→## Verification\n 25→\n 26→- `npm run build` compiles without errors\n 27→- `npm run test` passes (both new and existing queue tests)\n 28→- `npm run lint` passes with zero warnings\n 29→\n 30→## Risks\n 31→\n 32→- **BullModule.forRootAsync duplication**: `InvokeModule` already registers `BullModule.forRootAsync` (TODO on line 12). Registering again in `QueueModule` requires either hoisting to `AppModule` or ensuring NestJS deduplicates the root config. Safest: hoist to a shared import or use `BullModule.forRoot` at app level — but keep scope to this issue, document as follow-up for AW-3.\n 33→- **Per-issue dedup complexity**: `SqliteJobQueue` uses an atomic SQL subquery for single-issue locking. BullMQ equivalent requires either a custom lock mechanism or a concurrency-1 worker with job grouping. Needs careful implementation to preserve the same semantics.\n 34→\n\n<system-reminder>\nWhenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.\n</system-reminder>\n"}]},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"ef67cfa3-d97b-4dc4-8903-93fd215c1254","tool_use_result":{"type":"text","file":{"filePath":"/home/agent/AgentSDE/tasks/production/AgentSDE/agent-core/gh-457/plan/plan.md","content":"# AW-11: Create BullMQJobQueue implementing JobQueue interface\n\n## Summary\n\nReplace the SQLite-backed job queue with a BullMQ/Redis-backed implementation behind a `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` config flag. BullMQ dependencies (`bullmq`, `ioredis`, `@nestjs/bullmq`) are already installed from AW-2; the existing `BullModule.forRootAsync` pattern in `InvokeModule` (line 13) provides the Redis connection blueprint.\n\n## Files\n\n| File | Action | Description |\n|------|--------|-------------|\n| `src/queue/bullmq-job-queue.ts` | create | BullMQ implementation of `JobQueue` interface using `Queue` + `Worker` |\n| `src/queue/bullmq-job-queue.spec.ts` | create | Unit tests for BullMQJobQueue |\n| `src/queue/queue.module.ts` | modify | Conditional provider registration based on `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` |\n| `src/config/config.schema.ts` | modify | Add `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` Joi validation (valid: `sqlite`, `bullmq`; default: `sqlite`) |\n\n## Steps\n\n1. Add `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER: Joi.string().valid('sqlite', 'bullmq').default('sqlite')` to `config.schema.ts` (line 26).\n2. Create `src/queue/bullmq-job-queue.ts` implementing `JobQueue` interface (`enqueue()`, `onJob()`). Use BullMQ `Queue` for enqueuing and `Worker` for consuming. Inject `ConfigService` for Redis connection config (`REDIS_HOST`, `REDIS_PORT`, `REDIS_DB`) — follow the same `BullModule.forRootAsync` pattern from `invoke.module.ts:13-23`. Use `TenantConfigService` for per-org queue name isolation. BullMQ natively handles stalled job retry — no manual `onModuleInit` recovery needed.\n3. Implement per-issue concurrency control: use BullMQ's `job.data.issueNumber` as a group key to prevent concurrent processing of the same issue (matching `SqliteJobQueue`'s atomic claim semantics).\n4. Update `queue.module.ts` to use a factory provider: inject `ConfigService`, read `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER`, conditionally instantiate `BullMQJobQueue` or `SqliteJobQueue` for the `JOB_QUEUE` token. Import `BullModule.forRootAsync` and `BullModule.registerQueue` only when driver is `bullmq`. Keep `SqliteJobQueue` imports (TypeORM, EventEmitter) for the `sqlite` path.\n5. Create `bullmq-job-queue.spec.ts` with tests: enqueue adds job to queue, `onJob` registers handler, stalled job auto-retry, per-issue dedup, error handling marks job failed, and `OnModuleDestroy` cleanup.\n\n## Verification\n\n- `npm run build` compiles without errors\n- `npm run test` passes (both new and existing queue tests)\n- `npm run lint` passes with zero warnings\n\n## Risks\n\n- **BullModule.forRootAsync duplication**: `InvokeModule` already registers `BullModule.forRootAsync` (TODO on line 12). Registering again in `QueueModule` requires either hoisting to `AppModule` or ensuring NestJS deduplicates the root config. Safest: hoist to a shared import or use `BullModule.forRoot` at app level — but keep scope to this issue, document as follow-up for AW-3.\n- **Per-issue dedup complexity**: `SqliteJobQueue` uses an atomic SQL subquery for single-issue locking. BullMQ equivalent requires either a custom lock mechanism or a concurrency-1 worker with job grouping. Needs careful implementation to preserve the same semantics.\n","numLines":34,"startLine":1,"totalLines":34}}}
{"type":"assistant","message":{"model":"claude-sonnet-4-6","id":"msg_01RWRrxUdCywTRcXrkmyAZ19","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Cg8xcB8cZ9Ur4hWznTjL3T","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/home/agent/ai-agents-sde/.claude/worktrees/agent-core/issue-457-agents-md/AGENTS.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":6965,"cache_read_input_tokens":14160,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":6965},"output_tokens":0,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"},"context_management":null},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"d9af0b33-e412-4dd3-ba5b-a6d27c09166c"}
{"type":"rate_limit_event","rate_limit_info":{"status":"allowed","resetsAt":1776096000,"rateLimitType":"five_hour","overageStatus":"rejected","overageDisabledReason":"org_level_disabled","isUsingOverage":false},"uuid":"86824934-9639-46bc-9cdc-ea068f5b4646","session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f"}
{"type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Cg8xcB8cZ9Ur4hWznTjL3T","type":"tool_result","content":" 1→# Agent Configuration — agent-core\n 2→\n 3→## Purpose\n 4→\n 5→This is the core orchestration server for the AgentSDE pipeline. It is a production NestJS application. Changes here affect the live webhook handler and all downstream agent runs.\n 6→\n 7→## Skills Available\n 8→\n 9→- `/orchestrate` — used for all issue work (plan + implement + PR)\n 10→- `/review-pr` — used when reviewing PRs on this repo\n 11→\n 12→## Workflow\n 13→\n 14→1. Read the issue carefully — understand the impact on the webhook pipeline\n 15→2. Read the relevant source files before making changes\n 16→3. Run `npm run test` locally to verify unit tests pass\n 17→4. Run `npm run lint` — zero warnings are allowed\n 18→5. Create branch: `feat/<issue-number>-<slug>` or `fix/<issue-number>-<slug>`\n 19→6. Commit with message: `feat(<scope>): <what>` or `fix(<scope>): <what>`\n 20→7. Open PR with `Closes #<issue-number>` in the body\n 21→8. Do not merge your own PR — CI must pass first\n 22→9. When adding a new module, env var, or dev command, update CLAUDE.md in the same PR — `.env.example` is the canonical env vars reference; `src/` modules should all appear in the Key modules list\n 23→10. For documentation-only PRs (no TS/JS modified), steps 3–4 (test and lint) may be skipped — state this explicitly in the pre-commit checks comment\n 24→\n 25→## Task Phases\n 26→\n 27→1. `plan` — read the issue and relevant source files, identify the change\n 28→2. `implement` — make the change, write or update unit tests\n 29→3. `test` — run `npm run test` and `npm run lint`, fix any failures\n 30→4. `review` — open PR, wait for human approval gate\n 31→5. `deploy` — handled by CI on merge to master\n 32→\n 33→## Artefacts\n 34→\n 35→Task state is written to `AgentSDE/agent-core-artefacts` repo, branch `AgentSDE/agent-core/<issue-number>`.\n 36→\n 37→## Directive System\n 38→\n 39→- `ALLOWED_DIRECTIVES` in `directive.dto.ts` is the single source of truth — `DirectiveValue` union type auto-derives from it\n 40→- New directives must be wired in **two places**: `DirectiveService.applyDirective()` (internal API path) and `PhaseRouterService.route()` (GitHub webhook path); missing either creates a silent gap\n 41→- Transient directives (`retry`, `restart`) must **not** overwrite `task.directive` — preserve the task's execution directive (`auto`/`careful`/`quick`)\n 42→- Always post a GitHub feedback comment when a directive is rejected (terminal state, live process, unrecognised) — never drop silently\n 43→- When shipping a new directive or pipeline behavior, add its AGENTS.md documentation in the same PR — deferred documentation accumulates as separate cleanup issues\n 44→- Before closing an open PR on replan/restart, always post a \"superseded\" comment explaining the closure — silent PR closes are flagged by reviewers\n 45→- Each directive that resets task state should have its own dedicated reset method (`resetForReplan`, `resetForRestart`) with distinct semantics — avoid sharing or overloading a single method with conditional branching\n 46→- `DirectiveService.applyDirective()` does not enforce actor-level authorization — that responsibility lives at the GitHub webhook layer. In tests, document this boundary with a `TODO` and a reference issue rather than asserting service-level rejection\n 47→\n 48→### `skip-quality-gate` Directive\n 49→\n 50→- **Purpose:** One-time bypass of the pre-PR quality gate (lint + test checks) that runs before the deliver phase.\n 51→- **Usage:** `/agent skip-quality-gate`\n 52→- **One-time consumption:** The override is set on `task.qualityGateOverride = true` and consumed atomically at the start of the next deliver phase — `qualityGateOverride` is reset to `false` before invocation, so it cannot carry over to a subsequent deliver run.\n 53→- **Guardrails:**\n 54→ - Only affects the deliver phase; all other phase checks are unaffected.\n 55→ - Does not skip code review (the review phase runs independently of this flag).\n 56→ - Confirmation comment is posted to the issue when the override is set.\n 57→- **Source:** `directive.service.ts` (set), `phase-router.service.ts` (consume).\n 58→\n 59→### `refine` Directive — Pre-Validation\n 60→\n 61→- **Eligibility:** The task must have `status=gated`. The `/agent refine` directive re-runs the refine phase on a gated task (e.g. after a PM question-and-answer cycle).\n 62→- **Rejection — terminal state:** If `task.status` is `succeeded` or `failed`, the directive is rejected immediately with a GitHub comment explaining that refine is only valid for gated tasks.\n 63→- **Rejection — non-gated state:** If `task.status` is anything other than `gated` (e.g. `active`, `blocked`, `paused`), the directive is rejected with a GitHub comment showing the current status and the same eligibility requirement.\n 64→- **Remediation steps:**\n 65→ 1. Check the current task status via the control API or `task.json` in artefacts.\n 66→ 2. Resolve the underlying reason the task is not gated (e.g. wait for the active phase to complete, unblock a blocked task).\n 67→ 3. Retry `/agent refine` once the task reaches `status=gated`.\n 68→- **Source:** `directive.service.ts` (`applyDirective`, refine branch).\n 69→\n 70→## Multi-Tenant Consumer Migration (Wave 2+)\n 71→\n 72→When migrating any service from `GitHubService` to an abstract provider (e.g., `PlatformProvider`), update three layers atomically: (1) swap `@Inject(PLATFORM_PROVIDER) platform: PlatformProvider` in the constructor (remove `GitHubService` import), (2) replace `GitHubModule` with `PlatformModule` in the module `imports` array, (3) switch the spec mock from `{ provide: GitHubService, useValue: {...} }` to `{ provide: PLATFORM_PROVIDER, useValue: {...} }` and update the retrieved mock type to `jest.Mocked<PlatformProvider>`. Methods typed as optional on the provider interface (e.g., `setProjectItemStatus`) must use `?.()` — this is correct and intentional, not a typing gap.\n 73→\n 74→- PRs that are part of Wave 2+ multi-tenant migration should target `rc/multi-tenant` as the base branch — PRs targeting `master` will be redirected by reviewers. Check whether this branch exists before opening the PR.\n 75→- PRs that are part of the token usage tracking feature series (TU-*) should target `rc/token-usage` as the base branch, not `master` — same pattern as `rc/multi-tenant` for the multi-tenant wave. Token usage types live in `src/llm/llm-provider.interface.ts` (`UsageEntry`, `UsageData`); both `PhaseResult` and `SignalResult` carry `usage?: UsageData`.\n 76→- PRs that are part of the release strategy feature series (RS-*) should target `rc/release-strategy` as the base branch, not `master` — same pattern as `rc/multi-tenant` and `rc/token-usage`; check whether this branch exists before opening the PR.\n 77→- `PR_BASE_BRANCH` in the Claude invocation env overrides the deliver-phase PR target branch — set by `PhaseRouterService.buildEnv()` via `ReleaseService.findActiveForTask(taskId)`; returns `{ rcBranch, releaseId, baseBranch, key, title, status, directive }` when a task is in an active release, `null` otherwise. `buildEnv()` is async for this reason.\n 78→- When a Wave N dependency module (e.g., `PlatformModule`) is not yet merged, provide a minimal inline provider directly in the consuming module rather than importing the missing module — this unblocks Wave N+1 work without waiting for all dependencies to land; remove the stub once the real module is available.\n 79→- Reuse upstream injection tokens (e.g., `LLM_PROVIDER` from `llm-provider.interface.ts`) rather than defining a local duplicate — token mismatches cause silent DI failures that are hard to diagnose.\n 80→- Claude CLI `result` event has two usage objects with different casing: `modelUsage` (per-model, prefer this) uses camelCase fields (`inputTokens`, `cacheReadInputTokens`, `cacheCreationInputTokens`, `costUSD`); fallback aggregate `usage` uses snake_case (`input_tokens`, `cache_read_input_tokens`). Always prefer `modelUsage` for per-model breakdown.\n 81→- When adding a new field to `SignalResult`, update all four `safeResolve()` call sites in `ClaudeInvocationService` (no-signal, success, error, timeout) — missing any one path causes silent data gaps on that outcome.\n 82→- `TokenUsageService.record(taskId, phase, usage)` is the single write path for token usage — called once after every `this.claude.invoke()` in `PhaseRouterService`; it no-ops gracefully on `undefined`/empty usage so callers need no guard.\n 83→- `TokenUsageService` query methods (`computeSummary`, `computeByTask`, `computeByPhase`, `computeByProvider`, `computeTimeseries`) follow the `MetricsService` pattern — same `sinceExpr` filter, excluded-repos list, and raw SQL aggregation approach.\n 84→\n 85→## Testing Conventions\n 86→\n 87→- Never hardcode production paths (e.g., `/home/agent/AgentSDE/tasks/...`) in test files — CI machines don't have these directories; use `os.tmpdir()` or a `testTmpDir` fixture instead\n 88→- `ClaudeInvocationService` parses stdout as JSON lines (stream-json format); test stubs must wrap signals in JSON objects, not raw strings\n 89→- When multiple services derive the same filesystem path, centralize it in one helper (e.g., `ArtefactsService.buildCentralTaskDir()`) — prevents path drift across services\n 90→- Prefer real temp dirs over filesystem mocks for I/O-heavy services — mocking `fs` in unit tests for services like `ClaudeInvocationService` raises reviewer concerns and can miss real I/O edge cases\n 91→- When injecting a new shared service into multiple existing modules, update all three layers per consumer: (1) constructor injection in the service, (2) the consumer's module `imports` array (e.g., `TenantModule`), and (3) a mock provider in each `.spec.ts` — reviewers flag any missing layer as a DI breakage risk\n 92→- When pre-existing test failures exist on `master` unrelated to the change, call them out explicitly in the PR body (e.g., \"6 pre-existing watchdog failures unchanged\") — reviewers cannot distinguish regressions from known failures without this\n 93→- When adding a new pipeline status or phase transition, always cover three test scenarios: (1) idempotent re-entry (target state already set), (2) happy path, and (3) recovery path where the triggering condition resolves before the threshold — reviewers flag gaps in these as non-obvious but high-value coverage\n 94→- When testing services that read env vars directly, save and restore original values in `beforeEach`/`afterEach` — unrestored env mutations (e.g., `STUCK_THRESHOLD_MS`, `SLOW_THRESHOLD_MS`) silently corrupt other test suites running in the same Jest worker process\n 95→- For directive integration tests, wire `DirectiveService` with real `TaskStateService` + in-memory SQLite and mocked `GitHubService`/`ArtefactsService` — follow the `blocked-persistent-to-refine` pattern; each new directive spec should cover (1) happy path with open PR, (2) no-open-PR variant, and (3) terminal/active task rejection guard\n 96→- A cancelled E2E CI job (step interrupted by infra timeout, not an assertion failure) is not a code regression — re-trigger E2E after the fix; if the timeout recurs, escalate as a CI infra issue rather than treating it as a test failure\n 97→\n 98→## Logging Conventions\n 99→\n 100→- `{taskDir}/meta/` is the canonical per-task log directory — already included in `ARTEFACT_SUBDIRS`; files written there are synced to `agent-core-artefacts` automatically without further config changes\n 101→- When piping spawned-process stdout/stderr to a file write stream, open in append mode (`flags: 'a'`) and close the stream in both the `close` and `error` event handlers to avoid resource leaks\n 102→- In cleanup methods that `unlink` files in a loop, only swallow `ENOENT` errors; re-throw or log all other errors — broad `catch` blocks in cleanup paths are reviewers' top flag for silent data-loss risk\n 103→\n 104→## Adding a New Pipeline Phase\n 105→\n 106→When adding a new SDLC phase, all of the following must be updated in the same PR:\n 107→- `PHASE_ORDER` array and `phaseColumn()` map in `InternalAdapterService`\n 108→- `PHASE_TO_SKILL` map in `ClaudeInvocationService`\n 109→- New `phase<Name>` column on `TaskEntity` (with `DEFAULT 'pending'` for safe migration)\n 110→- `phaseName: 'pending'` in `createTask()` defaults in `TaskStateService`\n 111→- `onPhaseSkip` / `onPhaseComplete` hooks in `PhaseHooksService` if the phase needs lifecycle handling\n 112→- New skill files under `.claude/skills/<phase>/` (SKILL.md + role.md)\n 113→\n 114→**PR sizing:** Even though all these files change together, consider splitting DB schema changes (migration + entity) into a separate PR from routing and skill logic — reviewers flag large pipeline changes as high-risk.\n 115→- `phaseKey()` static map in `TaskStateService` — do NOT rely on dynamic camelCase derivation; it produces `phaseAddress_review` instead of `phaseAddressReview` for underscore-named phases; add an explicit entry to the static map for every new phase\n 116→- `setPhaseStatus(task, phase, status)` only mutates the in-memory entity — it does not persist to DB; to save the change, pass the field explicitly in the `updateTaskStatus()` call (e.g., `{ phaseReview: 'skipped' }`); entity mutation alone is silently discarded and will not survive the next DB read\n 117→\n 118→## Worktree Management\n 119→\n 120→- Use idempotent `getOrCreateWorktree()` instead of per-phase create/destroy: check if worktree is registered via `git worktree list --porcelain`, attach an existing branch without `-b`, or fresh-create — avoids `git branch -D` failures on checked-out branches that cause permanent stuck loops\n 121→- Move worktree cleanup to terminal state (`complete`) in `InternalAdapterService`, not in `finally` blocks inside `PhaseRouterService` — per-phase cleanup destroys worktrees still needed by subsequent phases\n 122→- Tasks that never reach `complete` (permanently blocked or abandoned) accumulate worktrees indefinitely — any cancellation or watchdog path that abandons a task must also call `cleanupWorktree()`\n 123→- On worktree reuse, run only `git fetch origin` to update remote-tracking refs — never `git reset --hard origin/master`; the branch already holds agent commits from prior phases, and a hard reset silently destroys them\n 124→\n 125→## Gate & Merge\n 126→\n 127→- Use an explicit `GATE_BYPASS_EVENT_TYPES = new Set(['directive', 'review_approved', 'ci_passed', 'ci_failure'])` in `PhaseRouterService` — replacing a bare `event.type !== 'directive'` check prevents `review_approved` and CI events from re-gating an already-approved task\n 128→- When a `review_approved` event arrives and the deliver phase is already complete, call `mergeIfReady()` directly — extract merge logic into a shared public method so both `onDeliverComplete` and the `review_approved` path reuse it without duplication\n 129→- Every phase-completion code path must call `phaseHooks.onPhaseComplete(task, phase)` explicitly — hooks inside `executePhase` do not fire on alternative paths (e.g., `review_approved` clearing the gate); a missing call silently skips lifecycle effects such as auto-merge even when the phase status is correctly written\n 130→\n 131→## Release Strategy\n 132→\n 133→A release is a configuration override that groups tasks and routes their PRs to an RC branch instead of master.\n 134→\n 135→### Data Model\n 136→\n 137→3 tables: `releases`, `release_tasks`, `release_repo_prs`.\n 138→\n 139→### Pipeline Integration\n 140→\n 141→When a task belongs to an active release:\n 142→- `PhaseRouterService.buildEnv()` sets `PR_BASE_BRANCH` to the RC branch\n 143→- The deliver skill creates PRs targeting the RC branch (not master)\n 144→- `findActiveForTask(taskId)` is the key lookup — queries `release_tasks` → `releases`\n 145→\n 146→- `GitHubService.findCommentByPrefix(owner, repo, issueNumber, prefix)` paginates issue comments (`per_page=100`) and returns `{ id, body } | null` — use it to locate a specific comment (e.g. `## Agent Plan`) before editing it.\n 147→- `PhaseHooksService.onPlanComplete()` appends a `## Release Context` section (human-readable + collapsed JSON metadata) to the existing plan comment when the task has an active release; falls back to posting a standalone comment if the plan comment is not found (handles GitHub API propagation lag).\n 148→\n 149→### Status Lifecycle\n 150→\n 151→`draft` → `active` → `staging` → `validating` → `validated` → `shipping` → `shipped`\n 152→(`failed` can transition back to `active` for retry)\n 153→\n 154→## Watchdog\n 155→\n 156→- Query `['active', 'gated']` statuses in `WatchdogService` — tasks waiting indefinitely for deliver-gate approval are invisible with `active`-only queries and accumulate as silent stuck issues\n 157→- Expose `POST /internal/watchdog/run` (returns `{ stuck, slow }`) for on-demand detection — avoids E2E tests waiting 5 minutes for the cron cycle; `runCheck()` should be a public method on the service\n 158→\n 159→## Test Environment\n 160→\n 161→A test instance of agent-core runs alongside production for E2E verification before merging to master.\n 162→\n 163→- **Test clone:** `/home/agent/AgentSDE/testing/agent-core` (branch: `testing`)\n 164→- **Port:** 8777, managed by pm2 as `agent-core-test`\n 165→- **Database:** `agent-core-test.db` (configured via `DB_NAME` env var, separate from production `agent-core.db`)\n 166→- **Nginx:** `wh.kontashera.com/test/*` proxies to `localhost:8777`\n 167→- **Webhook:** Repo-level webhook on `AgentSDE/agent-core-e2e` delivers to `wh.kontashera.com/test/webhooks/github`\n 168→- Never modify the test instance while production E2E or nightly runs are in progress\n 169→- Always restore `agent-core-e2e/.env` `AGENT_CORE_URL` back to `http://localhost:3000` after testing\n 170→- The `testing` branch can be force-pushed freely — it is not protected\n 171→\n 172→## Database Entities\n 173→\n 174→When adding a new TypeORM entity, update four locations atomically:\n 175→1. Create entity file under `src/database/entities/<name>.entity.ts`\n 176→2. Export from `src/database/entities/index.ts` barrel\n 177→3. Add to the `forRoot` entities array in `DatabaseModule`\n 178→4. Add to the `forFeature` array in `DatabaseModule`\n 179→\n 180→For SQLite: use `type: 'integer'`/`type: 'real'` for numeric columns (TypeORM defaults don't map correctly); use `@Column({ name: 'snake_case_name' })` for consistent snake_case DB column naming.\n 181→- When a service needs entities from another domain (e.g., `TaskEntity` in `ReleaseModule`), add them to the local `TypeOrmModule.forFeature()` array — do NOT import the owning module; avoids circular dependency risks.\n 182→- Before inserting into a join/relation table, always query existing rows and filter them out — silently inserting duplicates breaks unique constraints and is hard to diagnose at runtime.\n 183→\n 184→## REST Controllers\n 185→\n 186→- Throw HTTP exceptions (`NotFoundException`, etc.) in the controller layer, not in the service — services should return `null`/`undefined` for \"not found\" cases; the controller converts these to the appropriate HTTP status using NestJS built-in exceptions.\n 187→- Register new controllers in their owning module and import that module into `AppModule` in the same PR — a controller not imported into `AppModule` is silently unreachable.\n 188→\n 189→## Redis / BullMQ\n 190→\n 191→- Use a dedicated `ioredis` instance (`lazyConnect: true`) in `HealthModule` for `/health` Redis probes — never share BullMQ's internal connection; health checks coupled to queue lifecycle report misleading states during degraded scenarios\n 192→- Register queues via `BullModule.forRootAsync()` (ConfigService-driven) + `BullModule.registerQueue()` in `AppModule` — this is the established queue registration pattern\n 193→- Redis pub/sub requires two separate ioredis clients — one dedicated to publish (`pub`), one to subscribe (`sub`); a client in subscribe mode cannot also publish. Follow the `EventBusModule` factory pattern. `emit()` must swallow Redis errors; per-handler error isolation in `on()` prevents one failing handler from blocking others — event delivery must never block pipeline advancement\n 194→- When adding a BullMQ implementation behind a `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` config flag, use a factory provider to conditionally instantiate the driver and lazy-init `Queue`/`Worker` on first use — the default SQLite path never opens a Redis connection. If the BullMQ class manages its own `IORedis` connections directly, do NOT also register `BullModule.forRootAsync` in the same feature module — it conflicts with `InvokeModule`'s existing registration; use direct `IORedis` instances instead.\n 195→\n 196→## Important constraints\n 197→\n 198→- This service runs live on the VPS via pm2 (`pm2 restart agent-core` to reload)\n 199→- Port `3000` is proxied through nginx — do not change the port without updating nginx config\n 200→- `GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET` must match the secret configured in the GitHub org webhook\n 201→- The WAL file path (`agent-core-artefacts/watchdog/wal.jsonl`) is shared with the watchdog — do not change its location without updating both services\n 202→- `ClaudeInvocationService.invoke()` is now the primary entry point for agent runs; `dispatch-v2.sh`/`DispatchService` is legacy and being superseded by the `invoke` module\n 203→- `GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET` must be read with `get()` (not `getOrThrow()`) and verification skipped when unset — E2E environments deliberately omit the secret; `getOrThrow()` returns HTTP 500 instead of gracefully ignoring the event\n 204→- `TASK_DIR` is resolved by `ArtefactsService.buildCentralTaskDir()` and set in the Claude invocation env by `PhaseRouterService` — do not construct it independently in other services\n 205→\n\n<system-reminder>\nWhenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.\n</system-reminder>\n"}]},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"9431fa19-e875-4f3e-9b27-af8ad1eb5377","tool_use_result":{"type":"text","file":{"filePath":"/home/agent/ai-agents-sde/.claude/worktrees/agent-core/issue-457-agents-md/AGENTS.md","content":"# Agent Configuration — agent-core\n\n## Purpose\n\nThis is the core orchestration server for the AgentSDE pipeline. It is a production NestJS application. Changes here affect the live webhook handler and all downstream agent runs.\n\n## Skills Available\n\n- `/orchestrate` — used for all issue work (plan + implement + PR)\n- `/review-pr` — used when reviewing PRs on this repo\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Read the issue carefully — understand the impact on the webhook pipeline\n2. Read the relevant source files before making changes\n3. Run `npm run test` locally to verify unit tests pass\n4. Run `npm run lint` — zero warnings are allowed\n5. Create branch: `feat/<issue-number>-<slug>` or `fix/<issue-number>-<slug>`\n6. Commit with message: `feat(<scope>): <what>` or `fix(<scope>): <what>`\n7. Open PR with `Closes #<issue-number>` in the body\n8. Do not merge your own PR — CI must pass first\n9. When adding a new module, env var, or dev command, update CLAUDE.md in the same PR — `.env.example` is the canonical env vars reference; `src/` modules should all appear in the Key modules list\n10. For documentation-only PRs (no TS/JS modified), steps 3–4 (test and lint) may be skipped — state this explicitly in the pre-commit checks comment\n\n## Task Phases\n\n1. `plan` — read the issue and relevant source files, identify the change\n2. `implement` — make the change, write or update unit tests\n3. `test` — run `npm run test` and `npm run lint`, fix any failures\n4. `review` — open PR, wait for human approval gate\n5. `deploy` — handled by CI on merge to master\n\n## Artefacts\n\nTask state is written to `AgentSDE/agent-core-artefacts` repo, branch `AgentSDE/agent-core/<issue-number>`.\n\n## Directive System\n\n- `ALLOWED_DIRECTIVES` in `directive.dto.ts` is the single source of truth — `DirectiveValue` union type auto-derives from it\n- New directives must be wired in **two places**: `DirectiveService.applyDirective()` (internal API path) and `PhaseRouterService.route()` (GitHub webhook path); missing either creates a silent gap\n- Transient directives (`retry`, `restart`) must **not** overwrite `task.directive` — preserve the task's execution directive (`auto`/`careful`/`quick`)\n- Always post a GitHub feedback comment when a directive is rejected (terminal state, live process, unrecognised) — never drop silently\n- When shipping a new directive or pipeline behavior, add its AGENTS.md documentation in the same PR — deferred documentation accumulates as separate cleanup issues\n- Before closing an open PR on replan/restart, always post a \"superseded\" comment explaining the closure — silent PR closes are flagged by reviewers\n- Each directive that resets task state should have its own dedicated reset method (`resetForReplan`, `resetForRestart`) with distinct semantics — avoid sharing or overloading a single method with conditional branching\n- `DirectiveService.applyDirective()` does not enforce actor-level authorization — that responsibility lives at the GitHub webhook layer. In tests, document this boundary with a `TODO` and a reference issue rather than asserting service-level rejection\n\n### `skip-quality-gate` Directive\n\n- **Purpose:** One-time bypass of the pre-PR quality gate (lint + test checks) that runs before the deliver phase.\n- **Usage:** `/agent skip-quality-gate`\n- **One-time consumption:** The override is set on `task.qualityGateOverride = true` and consumed atomically at the start of the next deliver phase — `qualityGateOverride` is reset to `false` before invocation, so it cannot carry over to a subsequent deliver run.\n- **Guardrails:**\n - Only affects the deliver phase; all other phase checks are unaffected.\n - Does not skip code review (the review phase runs independently of this flag).\n - Confirmation comment is posted to the issue when the override is set.\n- **Source:** `directive.service.ts` (set), `phase-router.service.ts` (consume).\n\n### `refine` Directive — Pre-Validation\n\n- **Eligibility:** The task must have `status=gated`. The `/agent refine` directive re-runs the refine phase on a gated task (e.g. after a PM question-and-answer cycle).\n- **Rejection — terminal state:** If `task.status` is `succeeded` or `failed`, the directive is rejected immediately with a GitHub comment explaining that refine is only valid for gated tasks.\n- **Rejection — non-gated state:** If `task.status` is anything other than `gated` (e.g. `active`, `blocked`, `paused`), the directive is rejected with a GitHub comment showing the current status and the same eligibility requirement.\n- **Remediation steps:**\n 1. Check the current task status via the control API or `task.json` in artefacts.\n 2. Resolve the underlying reason the task is not gated (e.g. wait for the active phase to complete, unblock a blocked task).\n 3. Retry `/agent refine` once the task reaches `status=gated`.\n- **Source:** `directive.service.ts` (`applyDirective`, refine branch).\n\n## Multi-Tenant Consumer Migration (Wave 2+)\n\nWhen migrating any service from `GitHubService` to an abstract provider (e.g., `PlatformProvider`), update three layers atomically: (1) swap `@Inject(PLATFORM_PROVIDER) platform: PlatformProvider` in the constructor (remove `GitHubService` import), (2) replace `GitHubModule` with `PlatformModule` in the module `imports` array, (3) switch the spec mock from `{ provide: GitHubService, useValue: {...} }` to `{ provide: PLATFORM_PROVIDER, useValue: {...} }` and update the retrieved mock type to `jest.Mocked<PlatformProvider>`. Methods typed as optional on the provider interface (e.g., `setProjectItemStatus`) must use `?.()` — this is correct and intentional, not a typing gap.\n\n- PRs that are part of Wave 2+ multi-tenant migration should target `rc/multi-tenant` as the base branch — PRs targeting `master` will be redirected by reviewers. Check whether this branch exists before opening the PR.\n- PRs that are part of the token usage tracking feature series (TU-*) should target `rc/token-usage` as the base branch, not `master` — same pattern as `rc/multi-tenant` for the multi-tenant wave. Token usage types live in `src/llm/llm-provider.interface.ts` (`UsageEntry`, `UsageData`); both `PhaseResult` and `SignalResult` carry `usage?: UsageData`.\n- PRs that are part of the release strategy feature series (RS-*) should target `rc/release-strategy` as the base branch, not `master` — same pattern as `rc/multi-tenant` and `rc/token-usage`; check whether this branch exists before opening the PR.\n- `PR_BASE_BRANCH` in the Claude invocation env overrides the deliver-phase PR target branch — set by `PhaseRouterService.buildEnv()` via `ReleaseService.findActiveForTask(taskId)`; returns `{ rcBranch, releaseId, baseBranch, key, title, status, directive }` when a task is in an active release, `null` otherwise. `buildEnv()` is async for this reason.\n- When a Wave N dependency module (e.g., `PlatformModule`) is not yet merged, provide a minimal inline provider directly in the consuming module rather than importing the missing module — this unblocks Wave N+1 work without waiting for all dependencies to land; remove the stub once the real module is available.\n- Reuse upstream injection tokens (e.g., `LLM_PROVIDER` from `llm-provider.interface.ts`) rather than defining a local duplicate — token mismatches cause silent DI failures that are hard to diagnose.\n- Claude CLI `result` event has two usage objects with different casing: `modelUsage` (per-model, prefer this) uses camelCase fields (`inputTokens`, `cacheReadInputTokens`, `cacheCreationInputTokens`, `costUSD`); fallback aggregate `usage` uses snake_case (`input_tokens`, `cache_read_input_tokens`). Always prefer `modelUsage` for per-model breakdown.\n- When adding a new field to `SignalResult`, update all four `safeResolve()` call sites in `ClaudeInvocationService` (no-signal, success, error, timeout) — missing any one path causes silent data gaps on that outcome.\n- `TokenUsageService.record(taskId, phase, usage)` is the single write path for token usage — called once after every `this.claude.invoke()` in `PhaseRouterService`; it no-ops gracefully on `undefined`/empty usage so callers need no guard.\n- `TokenUsageService` query methods (`computeSummary`, `computeByTask`, `computeByPhase`, `computeByProvider`, `computeTimeseries`) follow the `MetricsService` pattern — same `sinceExpr` filter, excluded-repos list, and raw SQL aggregation approach.\n\n## Testing Conventions\n\n- Never hardcode production paths (e.g., `/home/agent/AgentSDE/tasks/...`) in test files — CI machines don't have these directories; use `os.tmpdir()` or a `testTmpDir` fixture instead\n- `ClaudeInvocationService` parses stdout as JSON lines (stream-json format); test stubs must wrap signals in JSON objects, not raw strings\n- When multiple services derive the same filesystem path, centralize it in one helper (e.g., `ArtefactsService.buildCentralTaskDir()`) — prevents path drift across services\n- Prefer real temp dirs over filesystem mocks for I/O-heavy services — mocking `fs` in unit tests for services like `ClaudeInvocationService` raises reviewer concerns and can miss real I/O edge cases\n- When injecting a new shared service into multiple existing modules, update all three layers per consumer: (1) constructor injection in the service, (2) the consumer's module `imports` array (e.g., `TenantModule`), and (3) a mock provider in each `.spec.ts` — reviewers flag any missing layer as a DI breakage risk\n- When pre-existing test failures exist on `master` unrelated to the change, call them out explicitly in the PR body (e.g., \"6 pre-existing watchdog failures unchanged\") — reviewers cannot distinguish regressions from known failures without this\n- When adding a new pipeline status or phase transition, always cover three test scenarios: (1) idempotent re-entry (target state already set), (2) happy path, and (3) recovery path where the triggering condition resolves before the threshold — reviewers flag gaps in these as non-obvious but high-value coverage\n- When testing services that read env vars directly, save and restore original values in `beforeEach`/`afterEach` — unrestored env mutations (e.g., `STUCK_THRESHOLD_MS`, `SLOW_THRESHOLD_MS`) silently corrupt other test suites running in the same Jest worker process\n- For directive integration tests, wire `DirectiveService` with real `TaskStateService` + in-memory SQLite and mocked `GitHubService`/`ArtefactsService` — follow the `blocked-persistent-to-refine` pattern; each new directive spec should cover (1) happy path with open PR, (2) no-open-PR variant, and (3) terminal/active task rejection guard\n- A cancelled E2E CI job (step interrupted by infra timeout, not an assertion failure) is not a code regression — re-trigger E2E after the fix; if the timeout recurs, escalate as a CI infra issue rather than treating it as a test failure\n\n## Logging Conventions\n\n- `{taskDir}/meta/` is the canonical per-task log directory — already included in `ARTEFACT_SUBDIRS`; files written there are synced to `agent-core-artefacts` automatically without further config changes\n- When piping spawned-process stdout/stderr to a file write stream, open in append mode (`flags: 'a'`) and close the stream in both the `close` and `error` event handlers to avoid resource leaks\n- In cleanup methods that `unlink` files in a loop, only swallow `ENOENT` errors; re-throw or log all other errors — broad `catch` blocks in cleanup paths are reviewers' top flag for silent data-loss risk\n\n## Adding a New Pipeline Phase\n\nWhen adding a new SDLC phase, all of the following must be updated in the same PR:\n- `PHASE_ORDER` array and `phaseColumn()` map in `InternalAdapterService`\n- `PHASE_TO_SKILL` map in `ClaudeInvocationService`\n- New `phase<Name>` column on `TaskEntity` (with `DEFAULT 'pending'` for safe migration)\n- `phaseName: 'pending'` in `createTask()` defaults in `TaskStateService`\n- `onPhaseSkip` / `onPhaseComplete` hooks in `PhaseHooksService` if the phase needs lifecycle handling\n- New skill files under `.claude/skills/<phase>/` (SKILL.md + role.md)\n\n**PR sizing:** Even though all these files change together, consider splitting DB schema changes (migration + entity) into a separate PR from routing and skill logic — reviewers flag large pipeline changes as high-risk.\n- `phaseKey()` static map in `TaskStateService` — do NOT rely on dynamic camelCase derivation; it produces `phaseAddress_review` instead of `phaseAddressReview` for underscore-named phases; add an explicit entry to the static map for every new phase\n- `setPhaseStatus(task, phase, status)` only mutates the in-memory entity — it does not persist to DB; to save the change, pass the field explicitly in the `updateTaskStatus()` call (e.g., `{ phaseReview: 'skipped' }`); entity mutation alone is silently discarded and will not survive the next DB read\n\n## Worktree Management\n\n- Use idempotent `getOrCreateWorktree()` instead of per-phase create/destroy: check if worktree is registered via `git worktree list --porcelain`, attach an existing branch without `-b`, or fresh-create — avoids `git branch -D` failures on checked-out branches that cause permanent stuck loops\n- Move worktree cleanup to terminal state (`complete`) in `InternalAdapterService`, not in `finally` blocks inside `PhaseRouterService` — per-phase cleanup destroys worktrees still needed by subsequent phases\n- Tasks that never reach `complete` (permanently blocked or abandoned) accumulate worktrees indefinitely — any cancellation or watchdog path that abandons a task must also call `cleanupWorktree()`\n- On worktree reuse, run only `git fetch origin` to update remote-tracking refs — never `git reset --hard origin/master`; the branch already holds agent commits from prior phases, and a hard reset silently destroys them\n\n## Gate & Merge\n\n- Use an explicit `GATE_BYPASS_EVENT_TYPES = new Set(['directive', 'review_approved', 'ci_passed', 'ci_failure'])` in `PhaseRouterService` — replacing a bare `event.type !== 'directive'` check prevents `review_approved` and CI events from re-gating an already-approved task\n- When a `review_approved` event arrives and the deliver phase is already complete, call `mergeIfReady()` directly — extract merge logic into a shared public method so both `onDeliverComplete` and the `review_approved` path reuse it without duplication\n- Every phase-completion code path must call `phaseHooks.onPhaseComplete(task, phase)` explicitly — hooks inside `executePhase` do not fire on alternative paths (e.g., `review_approved` clearing the gate); a missing call silently skips lifecycle effects such as auto-merge even when the phase status is correctly written\n\n## Release Strategy\n\nA release is a configuration override that groups tasks and routes their PRs to an RC branch instead of master.\n\n### Data Model\n\n3 tables: `releases`, `release_tasks`, `release_repo_prs`.\n\n### Pipeline Integration\n\nWhen a task belongs to an active release:\n- `PhaseRouterService.buildEnv()` sets `PR_BASE_BRANCH` to the RC branch\n- The deliver skill creates PRs targeting the RC branch (not master)\n- `findActiveForTask(taskId)` is the key lookup — queries `release_tasks` → `releases`\n\n- `GitHubService.findCommentByPrefix(owner, repo, issueNumber, prefix)` paginates issue comments (`per_page=100`) and returns `{ id, body } | null` — use it to locate a specific comment (e.g. `## Agent Plan`) before editing it.\n- `PhaseHooksService.onPlanComplete()` appends a `## Release Context` section (human-readable + collapsed JSON metadata) to the existing plan comment when the task has an active release; falls back to posting a standalone comment if the plan comment is not found (handles GitHub API propagation lag).\n\n### Status Lifecycle\n\n`draft` → `active` → `staging` → `validating` → `validated` → `shipping` → `shipped`\n(`failed` can transition back to `active` for retry)\n\n## Watchdog\n\n- Query `['active', 'gated']` statuses in `WatchdogService` — tasks waiting indefinitely for deliver-gate approval are invisible with `active`-only queries and accumulate as silent stuck issues\n- Expose `POST /internal/watchdog/run` (returns `{ stuck, slow }`) for on-demand detection — avoids E2E tests waiting 5 minutes for the cron cycle; `runCheck()` should be a public method on the service\n\n## Test Environment\n\nA test instance of agent-core runs alongside production for E2E verification before merging to master.\n\n- **Test clone:** `/home/agent/AgentSDE/testing/agent-core` (branch: `testing`)\n- **Port:** 8777, managed by pm2 as `agent-core-test`\n- **Database:** `agent-core-test.db` (configured via `DB_NAME` env var, separate from production `agent-core.db`)\n- **Nginx:** `wh.kontashera.com/test/*` proxies to `localhost:8777`\n- **Webhook:** Repo-level webhook on `AgentSDE/agent-core-e2e` delivers to `wh.kontashera.com/test/webhooks/github`\n- Never modify the test instance while production E2E or nightly runs are in progress\n- Always restore `agent-core-e2e/.env` `AGENT_CORE_URL` back to `http://localhost:3000` after testing\n- The `testing` branch can be force-pushed freely — it is not protected\n\n## Database Entities\n\nWhen adding a new TypeORM entity, update four locations atomically:\n1. Create entity file under `src/database/entities/<name>.entity.ts`\n2. Export from `src/database/entities/index.ts` barrel\n3. Add to the `forRoot` entities array in `DatabaseModule`\n4. Add to the `forFeature` array in `DatabaseModule`\n\nFor SQLite: use `type: 'integer'`/`type: 'real'` for numeric columns (TypeORM defaults don't map correctly); use `@Column({ name: 'snake_case_name' })` for consistent snake_case DB column naming.\n- When a service needs entities from another domain (e.g., `TaskEntity` in `ReleaseModule`), add them to the local `TypeOrmModule.forFeature()` array — do NOT import the owning module; avoids circular dependency risks.\n- Before inserting into a join/relation table, always query existing rows and filter them out — silently inserting duplicates breaks unique constraints and is hard to diagnose at runtime.\n\n## REST Controllers\n\n- Throw HTTP exceptions (`NotFoundException`, etc.) in the controller layer, not in the service — services should return `null`/`undefined` for \"not found\" cases; the controller converts these to the appropriate HTTP status using NestJS built-in exceptions.\n- Register new controllers in their owning module and import that module into `AppModule` in the same PR — a controller not imported into `AppModule` is silently unreachable.\n\n## Redis / BullMQ\n\n- Use a dedicated `ioredis` instance (`lazyConnect: true`) in `HealthModule` for `/health` Redis probes — never share BullMQ's internal connection; health checks coupled to queue lifecycle report misleading states during degraded scenarios\n- Register queues via `BullModule.forRootAsync()` (ConfigService-driven) + `BullModule.registerQueue()` in `AppModule` — this is the established queue registration pattern\n- Redis pub/sub requires two separate ioredis clients — one dedicated to publish (`pub`), one to subscribe (`sub`); a client in subscribe mode cannot also publish. Follow the `EventBusModule` factory pattern. `emit()` must swallow Redis errors; per-handler error isolation in `on()` prevents one failing handler from blocking others — event delivery must never block pipeline advancement\n- When adding a BullMQ implementation behind a `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` config flag, use a factory provider to conditionally instantiate the driver and lazy-init `Queue`/`Worker` on first use — the default SQLite path never opens a Redis connection. If the BullMQ class manages its own `IORedis` connections directly, do NOT also register `BullModule.forRootAsync` in the same feature module — it conflicts with `InvokeModule`'s existing registration; use direct `IORedis` instances instead.\n\n## Important constraints\n\n- This service runs live on the VPS via pm2 (`pm2 restart agent-core` to reload)\n- Port `3000` is proxied through nginx — do not change the port without updating nginx config\n- `GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET` must match the secret configured in the GitHub org webhook\n- The WAL file path (`agent-core-artefacts/watchdog/wal.jsonl`) is shared with the watchdog — do not change its location without updating both services\n- `ClaudeInvocationService.invoke()` is now the primary entry point for agent runs; `dispatch-v2.sh`/`DispatchService` is legacy and being superseded by the `invoke` module\n- `GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET` must be read with `get()` (not `getOrThrow()`) and verification skipped when unset — E2E environments deliberately omit the secret; `getOrThrow()` returns HTTP 500 instead of gracefully ignoring the event\n- `TASK_DIR` is resolved by `ArtefactsService.buildCentralTaskDir()` and set in the Claude invocation env by `PhaseRouterService` — do not construct it independently in other services\n","numLines":205,"startLine":1,"totalLines":205}}}
{"type":"assistant","message":{"model":"claude-sonnet-4-6","id":"msg_01JgV4iBFk1XvYv3Lku7wLPe","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Now let me also check what context.json says and look at the PR that was already created (PR #475) for learnings. Let me check if the task.json exists elsewhere, and also look at the PR content.\n\nLooking at the plan.md, this was about creating a BullMQ job queue. The PR #475 was already created and merged (based on git log: \"docs: update AGENTS.md with learnings from #457 (#475)\"). \n\nThe AGENTS.md already has the Redis/BullMQ section with:\n- \"When adding a BullMQ implementation behind a `JOB_QUEUE_DRIVER` config flag, use a factory provider to conditionally instantiate the driver and lazy-init `Queue`/`Worker` on first use — the default SQLite path never opens a Redis connection. \n\nThe key learning is that if BullMQ manages its own IORedis connections directly, I shouldn't also register BullModule.forRootAsync in the same feature module since it conflicts with InvokeModule's existing registration — I should use direct IORedis instances instead. Since PR #475 was already merged and documented these learnings, the compound-learnings task for issue #457 is complete. The PR has already been merged to master with the AGENTS.md documentation updated to include the Redis/BullMQ learnings from issue #457, so I should emit COMPLETE to signal that this task is already done.","signature":"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"}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":7885,"cache_read_input_tokens":21125,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":7885},"output_tokens":9,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"},"context_management":null},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"1265ccf8-d011-48bf-989f-a1350c5f7445"}
{"type":"assistant","message":{"model":"claude-sonnet-4-6","id":"msg_01JgV4iBFk1XvYv3Lku7wLPe","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"The PR #475 is already merged to master (confirmed in git log: `2313ce8 docs: update AGENTS.md with learnings from #457 (#475)`). The BullMQ/Redis entry at line 194 of AGENTS.md already captures the key learnings from issue #457. No new action needed.\n\n<promise>COMPLETE</promise>"}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":7885,"cache_read_input_tokens":21125,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":7885},"output_tokens":9,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"},"context_management":null},"parent_tool_use_id":null,"session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","uuid":"96833323-7494-457c-b522-db0519c56988"}
{"type":"result","subtype":"success","is_error":false,"duration_ms":19603,"duration_api_ms":19340,"num_turns":4,"result":"The PR #475 is already merged to master (confirmed in git log: `2313ce8 docs: update AGENTS.md with learnings from #457 (#475)`). The BullMQ/Redis entry at line 194 of AGENTS.md already captures the key learnings from issue #457. No new action needed.\n\n<promise>COMPLETE</promise>","stop_reason":"end_turn","session_id":"7d3c1362-b8f6-4b42-8351-f0787108346f","total_cost_usd":0.08108699999999999,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":14850,"cache_read_input_tokens":35285,"output_tokens":987,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":14850,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"},"modelUsage":{"claude-sonnet-4-6":{"inputTokens":3,"outputTokens":987,"cacheReadInputTokens":35285,"cacheCreationInputTokens":14850,"webSearchRequests":0,"costUSD":0.08108699999999999,"contextWindow":200000,"maxOutputTokens":32000}},"permission_denials":[],"fast_mode_state":"off","uuid":"4d83fe27-c0e6-4ead-8dc5-f2386f1c0970"}